Australia vs El Salvador: Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre

Australia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
96th
El Salvador rank
95th

Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • El Salvador
00000196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 96th and El Salvador ranks 95th of 111 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice cultivation — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre, Australia or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice cultivation — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre between Australia and El Salvador?
0 kt per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and El Salvador rank globally for rice cultivation — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 96th and El Salvador ranks 95th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs El Salvador: Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-cultivation-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/australia/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-cultivation-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/australia/el-salvador/">Australia vs El Salvador: Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
112 places, 6,585 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.