China, Taiwan Province of vs Sierra Leone: Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

China, Taiwan Province of
1,286 kt
in 2050
Sierra Leone
1,195 kt
in 2050
China, Taiwan Province of rank
37th
Sierra Leone rank
38th

Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Sierra Leone
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196120052050

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports 1,286 kt against 1,195 kt in Sierra Leone, a difference of 91 kt.

That makes China, Taiwan Province of's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Taiwan Province of ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 37th and Sierra Leone ranks 38th of 115 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, China, Taiwan Province of averaged higher in 8 and Sierra Leone in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 3,989 kt 545.08 kt 3,444 kt China, Taiwan Province of
1970s 3,869 kt 691.04 kt 3,178 kt China, Taiwan Province of
1980s 2,925 kt 683.74 kt 2,241 kt China, Taiwan Province of
1990s 1,948 kt 588.55 kt 1,360 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2000s 1,420 kt 858.99 kt 560.93 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 1,346 kt 1,322 kt 24.4 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 1,206 kt 1,432 kt 226.1 kt Sierra Leone
2030s 1,447 kt 980.07 kt 467.14 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2050s 1,286 kt 1,195 kt 90.62 kt China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice cultivation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, China, Taiwan Province of or Sierra Leone?
China, Taiwan Province of, at 1,286 kt against 1,195 kt in Sierra Leone as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice cultivation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between China, Taiwan Province of and Sierra Leone?
91 kt, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Sierra Leone?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Sierra Leone rank globally for rice cultivation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 37th and Sierra Leone ranks 38th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Sierra Leone: Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-cultivation-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/china-taiwan-province-of/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-cultivation-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/china-taiwan-province-of/sierra-leone/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Sierra Leone: Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
163 places, 9,899 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf