Hungary vs Sudan: Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Hungary
- Sudan
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 20.1 kt against 19.53 kt in Sudan, a difference of 0.57 kt.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 91st and Sudan ranks 92nd of 115 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.61 kt | 39.25 kt | 17.64 kt | Sudan |
| 2020s | 20.34 kt | 30.39 kt | 10.05 kt | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice cultivation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Hungary or Sudan?
- Hungary, at 20.1 kt against 19.53 kt in Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in rice cultivation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Hungary and Sudan?
- 0.57 kt, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Sudan rank globally for rice cultivation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Hungary ranks 91st and Sudan ranks 92nd of 115 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf