Congo vs New Zealand: Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Congo
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
117th
New Zealand rank
119th

Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • New Zealand
00000196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 2.2 times New Zealand's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 117th and New Zealand ranks 119th of 122 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Congo or New Zealand?
Congo, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Congo and New Zealand?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and New Zealand rank globally for rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 117th and New Zealand ranks 119th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs New Zealand: Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/new-zealand/">Congo vs New Zealand: Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 7,035 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.