Which has higher rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp, Australia or Congo?

Australia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Congo as of 2023.

What is the difference in rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp between Australia and Congo?

0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Congo: Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP

Australia

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Congo

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Australia rank

100th

Congo rank

101st

Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP over time

Australia
Congo

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Australia ranks 100th and Congo ranks 101st of 121 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	Congo	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Congo
1970s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Congo
1980s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Australia
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Australia
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Australia
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Australia
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp, Australia or Congo?: Australia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp between Australia and Congo?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Congo rank globally for rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp?: Australia ranks 100th and Congo ranks 101st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Congo: Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/congo-rep/">Australia vs Congo: Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 122 places, 6,686 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 28 September 2026

Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.