Guyana vs Uzbekistan: Rice — Emissions (CO2eq)
Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Guyana
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 1,398 kt against 1,282 kt in Guyana, a difference of 116 kt.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Guyana ranks 46th and Uzbekistan ranks 44th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 946.52 kt | 2,007 kt | 1,060 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 899.71 kt | 1,016 kt | 116.36 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 1,274 kt | 1,187 kt | 87.78 kt | Guyana |
| 2020s | 1,296 kt | 1,357 kt | 60.92 kt | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — emissions (co2eq), Guyana or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 1,398 kt against 1,282 kt in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in rice — emissions (co2eq) between Guyana and Uzbekistan?
- 116 kt, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Uzbekistan rank globally for rice — emissions (co2eq)?
- Guyana ranks 46th and Uzbekistan ranks 44th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.