Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Rice — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate

Central African Republic
0.0647 % change on previous year
in 2023
Eswatini
0.1067 % change on previous year
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
59th
Eswatini rank
57th

Rice — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Eswatini
-1000100200300196219922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.1067 % change on previous year against 0.0647 % change on previous year in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.042 % change on previous year.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.6 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 29 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 59th and Eswatini ranks 57th of 130 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 1.06 % change on previous year -1.8 % change on previous year 2.86 % change on previous year Central African Republic
1970s 0.8216 % change on previous year 4.14 % change on previous year 3.32 % change on previous year Eswatini
1980s -3.16 % change on previous year 4.43 % change on previous year 7.59 % change on previous year Eswatini
1990s 0.7351 % change on previous year 45.09 % change on previous year 44.36 % change on previous year Eswatini
2000s 0.7052 % change on previous year -0.1345 % change on previous year 0.8397 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2010s 0.7382 % change on previous year -0.1515 % change on previous year 0.8898 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2020s 3.71 % change on previous year 0.1575 % change on previous year 3.55 % change on previous year Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — emissions intensity, annual growth rate, Central African Republic or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.1067 % change on previous year against 0.0647 % change on previous year in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — emissions intensity, annual growth rate between Central African Republic and Eswatini?
0.042 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Eswatini?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Eswatini rank globally for rice — emissions intensity, annual growth rate?
Central African Republic ranks 59th and Eswatini ranks 57th of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Rice — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/central-african-republic/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/central-african-republic/eswatini/">Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Rice — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 9,012 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.