Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Rye — Crop residues
Rye — Crop residues over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 55th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 55th of 66 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2030s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2050s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rye — crop residues, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ecuador, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Kyrgyzstan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in rye — crop residues between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for rye — crop residues?
- Ecuador ranks 55th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 55th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rye — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).