Ecuador vs Tajikistan: Rye — Crop residues
Rye — Crop residues over time
- Ecuador
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Tajikistan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 55th and Tajikistan ranks 55th of 66 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2030s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2050s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rye — crop residues, Ecuador or Tajikistan?
- Ecuador, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Tajikistan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in rye — crop residues between Ecuador and Tajikistan?
- 0 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tajikistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
- How do Ecuador and Tajikistan rank globally for rye — crop residues?
- Ecuador ranks 55th and Tajikistan ranks 55th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rye — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).