China, Hong Kong SAR vs Finland: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)
China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Finland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
126th
Finland rank
126th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Finland
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Finland, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Finland ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th and Finland ranks 126th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.11 % change on previous year | -17.3 % change on previous year | 16.19 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2000s | 35.92 % change on previous year | 7.17 % change on previous year | 28.75 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | -54.6 % change on previous year | 95.94 % change on previous year | 150.54 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 2020s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Finland?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Finland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Finland?
- 0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Finland?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2022.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Finland rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th and Finland ranks 126th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.