El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)

El Salvador
-7.69 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
-8.54 % change on previous year
in 2024
El Salvador rank
71st
Zimbabwe rank
72nd

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600800199120072024

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports -7.69 % change on previous year against -8.54 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.85 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

El Salvador ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s -5.76 % change on previous year 33.05 % change on previous year 38.81 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s 9.9 % change on previous year -13.66 % change on previous year 23.56 % change on previous year El Salvador
2010s 76.83 % change on previous year 2.23 % change on previous year 74.6 % change on previous year El Salvador
2020s 99.13 % change on previous year 10.2 % change on previous year 88.92 % change on previous year El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
El Salvador, at -7.69 % change on previous year against -8.54 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
0.85 % change on previous year, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
El Salvador ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/el-salvador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/el-salvador/zimbabwe/">El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 5,907 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.