Gibraltar vs Solomon Islands: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)
Gibraltar
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Solomon Islands
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Gibraltar rank
126th
Solomon Islands rank
126th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time
- Gibraltar
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 126th and Solomon Islands ranks 126th of 185 countries.
Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Gibraltar or Solomon Islands?
- Gibraltar, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Solomon Islands as of 2001.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Gibraltar and Solomon Islands?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Gibraltar and Solomon Islands rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Gibraltar ranks 126th and Solomon Islands ranks 126th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.