Libya vs Samoa: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)
Libya
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Samoa
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Libya rank
126th
Samoa rank
126th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time
- Libya
- Samoa
How they compare
Libya currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Samoa, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Samoa ahead.
Libya ranks 126th and Samoa ranks 126th of 185 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Libya or Samoa?
- Libya, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Samoa as of 2000.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Libya and Samoa?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Samoa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Libya and Samoa rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Libya ranks 126th and Samoa ranks 126th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.