Malaysia vs Polynesia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)
Malaysia
-98.98 % change on previous year
in 2022
Polynesia
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Malaysia rank
125th
Polynesia rank
126th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time
- Malaysia
- Polynesia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports -98.98 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Polynesia, a difference of 1.02 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Polynesia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 125th and Polynesia ranks 126th of 185 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Malaysia or Polynesia?
- Malaysia, at -98.98 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Polynesia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Malaysia and Polynesia?
- 1.02 % change on previous year, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Polynesia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Malaysia and Polynesia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Malaysia ranks 125th and Polynesia ranks 126th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.