Polynesia vs Turkmenistan: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)
Polynesia
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Turkmenistan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Polynesia rank
126th
Turkmenistan rank
126th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time
- Polynesia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Polynesia ranks 126th and Turkmenistan ranks 126th of 185 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Polynesia or Turkmenistan?
- Polynesia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan as of 1999.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Polynesia and Turkmenistan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Turkmenistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Polynesia and Turkmenistan rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Polynesia ranks 126th and Turkmenistan ranks 126th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.