Australia and New Zealand vs Northern America: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
2.73 million ha
in 2024
Northern America
4.51 million ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
12th
Northern America rank
14th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Northern America
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199020072024

How they compare

Northern America currently reports 4.51 million ha against 2.73 million ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.78 million ha.

That makes Northern America's figure about 1.7 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Northern America ranks 14th of 221 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Northern America in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Northern America Difference Ahead
1990s 10.88 million ha 1.67 million ha 9.21 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 6.89 million ha 2.01 million ha 4.87 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 5.10 million ha 2.54 million ha 2.56 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 3.45 million ha 4.39 million ha 939,456 ha Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or Northern America?
Northern America, at 4.51 million ha against 2.73 million ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and Northern America?
1.78 million ha, with Northern America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Northern America?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Northern America rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Northern America ranks 14th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Northern America: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/northern-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/northern-america/">Australia and New Zealand vs Northern America: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.