Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area

Australia
2.73 million ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand
2.73 million ha
in 2024
Australia rank
13th
Australia and New Zealand rank
12th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time

  • Australia
  • Australia and New Zealand
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 2.73 million ha against 2.73 million ha in Australia, a difference of 730 ha.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 13th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th of 221 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 10.88 million ha 10.88 million ha 168 ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 6.89 million ha 6.89 million ha 141 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 5.10 million ha 5.10 million ha 401 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 3.45 million ha 3.45 million ha 542 ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Australia or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia and New Zealand, at 2.73 million ha against 2.73 million ha in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
730 ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
Australia ranks 13th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/">Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.