Austria vs Estonia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Austria
0 ha
in 2024
Estonia
0 ha
in 2024
Austria rank
122nd
Estonia rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Austria
- Estonia
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Estonia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Austria ranks 122nd and Estonia ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.55 ha | 186.61 ha | 155.06 ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 127.04 ha | 857.91 ha | 730.87 ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 53.82 ha | 151.06 ha | 97.25 ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 4.31 ha | 25.9 ha | 21.59 ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Austria or Estonia?
- Austria, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Austria and Estonia?
- 0 ha, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Estonia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Estonia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Austria ranks 122nd and Estonia ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.