Austria vs Uzbekistan: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Austria
0 ha
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 ha
in 2024
Austria rank
122nd
Uzbekistan rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Austria
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Austria ranks 122nd and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.55 ha | 5,653 ha | 5,621 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 127.04 ha | 1,151 ha | 1,024 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 53.82 ha | 51.57 ha | 2.25 ha | Austria |
| 2020s | 4.31 ha | 0 ha | 4.31 ha | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Austria or Uzbekistan?
- Austria, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Austria and Uzbekistan?
- 0 ha, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Uzbekistan rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Austria ranks 122nd and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.