Barbados vs Grenada: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Barbados
0 ha
in 2024
Grenada
0 ha
in 2024
Barbados rank
122nd
Grenada rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Barbados
- Grenada
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Grenada, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 122nd and Grenada ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8849 ha | 0.8848 ha | 0.0001 ha | Barbados |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 2.14 ha | 2.14 ha | Grenada |
| 2010s | 2.14 ha | 2.14 ha | 0.0002 ha | Barbados |
| 2020s | 4.28 ha | 0 ha | 4.28 ha | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Barbados or Grenada?
- Barbados, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Barbados and Grenada?
- 0 ha, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Grenada?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Grenada rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Barbados ranks 122nd and Grenada ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.