Belarus vs Iceland: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Belarus
1,444 ha
in 2024
Iceland
1,447 ha
in 2024
Belarus rank
91st
Iceland rank
90th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Belarus
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1,447 ha against 1,444 ha in Belarus, a difference of 3 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 91st and Iceland ranks 90th of 221 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,942 ha | 26.44 ha | 7,916 ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 22,391 ha | 4.32 ha | 22,387 ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 16,716 ha | 0 ha | 16,716 ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 7,094 ha | 298.11 ha | 6,796 ha | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Belarus or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 1,447 ha against 1,444 ha in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Belarus and Iceland?
- 3 ha, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Iceland?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Iceland rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Belarus ranks 91st and Iceland ranks 90th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.