Belgium-Luxembourg vs Norway: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Belgium-Luxembourg
0 ha
in 1999
Norway
0 ha
in 2024
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
122nd
Norway rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Norway
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 122nd and Norway ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Belgium-Luxembourg or Norway?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway as of 1999.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Belgium-Luxembourg and Norway?
- 0 ha, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Norway?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Norway rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 122nd and Norway ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.