Belgium-Luxembourg vs Samoa: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Belgium-Luxembourg
0 ha
in 1999
Samoa
0 ha
in 2024
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
122nd
Samoa rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Samoa
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Samoa, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 122nd and Samoa ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Belgium-Luxembourg or Samoa?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Samoa as of 1999.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Belgium-Luxembourg and Samoa?
- 0 ha, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Samoa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Samoa rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 122nd and Samoa ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.