Belgium vs Lesotho: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Belgium
0 ha
in 2024
Lesotho
0 ha
in 2024
Belgium rank
122nd
Lesotho rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Belgium
- Lesotho
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Lesotho, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lesotho ahead.
Belgium ranks 122nd and Lesotho ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.47 ha | 3,053 ha | 3,018 ha | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 53.86 ha | 0 ha | 53.86 ha | Belgium |
| 2020s | 25.85 ha | 4.29 ha | 21.56 ha | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Belgium or Lesotho?
- Belgium, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Lesotho as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Belgium and Lesotho?
- 0 ha, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Lesotho?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Lesotho rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Belgium ranks 122nd and Lesotho ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.