Chile vs Eswatini: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area

Chile
29,044 ha
in 2024
Eswatini
34,989 ha
in 2024
Chile rank
60th
Eswatini rank
57th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time

  • Chile
  • Eswatini
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199020072024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 34,989 ha against 29,044 ha in Chile, a difference of 5,945 ha.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 60th and Eswatini ranks 57th of 221 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 24,072 ha 33,893 ha 9,821 ha Eswatini
2000s 15,899 ha 13,393 ha 2,506 ha Chile
2010s 48,908 ha 17,242 ha 31,667 ha Chile
2020s 39,232 ha 17,934 ha 21,298 ha Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Chile or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 34,989 ha against 29,044 ha in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Chile and Eswatini?
5,945 ha, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Chile and Eswatini rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
Chile ranks 60th and Eswatini ranks 57th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Eswatini: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/chile/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/chile/eswatini/">Chile vs Eswatini: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.