Chile vs Kenya: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Chile
29,044 ha
in 2024
Kenya
24,512 ha
in 2024
Chile rank
60th
Kenya rank
61st
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Chile
- Kenya
How they compare
Chile currently reports 29,044 ha against 24,512 ha in Kenya, a difference of 4,532 ha.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kenya ahead.
Chile ranks 60th and Kenya ranks 61st of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24,072 ha | 106,659 ha | 82,587 ha | Kenya |
| 2000s | 15,899 ha | 57,658 ha | 41,759 ha | Kenya |
| 2010s | 48,908 ha | 27,655 ha | 21,253 ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 39,232 ha | 25,217 ha | 14,015 ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Chile or Kenya?
- Chile, at 29,044 ha against 24,512 ha in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Chile and Kenya?
- 4,532 ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kenya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Kenya rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Chile ranks 60th and Kenya ranks 61st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.