China, Hong Kong SAR vs Uzbekistan: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 ha
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 ha
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
122nd
Uzbekistan rank
122nd

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Uzbekistan
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199020072024

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 ha.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 122nd and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 221 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 184.67 ha 5,653 ha 5,468 ha Uzbekistan
2000s 312.37 ha 1,151 ha 838.41 ha Uzbekistan
2010s 233.39 ha 51.57 ha 181.82 ha China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 102.78 ha 0 ha 102.78 ha China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, China, Hong Kong SAR or Uzbekistan?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between China, Hong Kong SAR and Uzbekistan?
0 ha, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Uzbekistan?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Uzbekistan rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 122nd and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Uzbekistan: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/uzbekistan/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Uzbekistan: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.