China vs Nepal: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
China
115,440 ha
in 2024
Nepal
127,450 ha
in 2024
China rank
43rd
Nepal rank
41st
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- China
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 127,450 ha against 115,440 ha in China, a difference of 12,010 ha.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.
China ranks 43rd and Nepal ranks 41st of 221 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 267,102 ha | 24,405 ha | 242,697 ha | China |
| 2000s | 585,433 ha | 23,797 ha | 561,636 ha | China |
| 2010s | 326,181 ha | 40,863 ha | 285,318 ha | China |
| 2020s | 163,807 ha | 66,357 ha | 97,450 ha | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, China or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 127,450 ha against 115,440 ha in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between China and Nepal?
- 12,010 ha, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Nepal?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China and Nepal rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- China ranks 43rd and Nepal ranks 41st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.