Costa Rica vs Serbia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Costa Rica
11,887 ha
in 2024
Serbia
12,150 ha
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
67th
Serbia rank
66th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Costa Rica
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 12,150 ha against 11,887 ha in Costa Rica, a difference of 263 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 66th of 221 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,408 ha | 7,812 ha | 404.21 ha | Serbia |
| 2010s | 13,980 ha | 3,200 ha | 10,780 ha | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 10,104 ha | 3,729 ha | 6,375 ha | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Costa Rica or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 12,150 ha against 11,887 ha in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Costa Rica and Serbia?
- 263 ha, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Serbia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Costa Rica ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 66th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.