Eritrea vs Finland: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Eritrea
0 ha
in 2024
Finland
0 ha
in 2024
Eritrea rank
122nd
Finland rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Eritrea
- Finland
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Finland, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 122nd and Finland ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,565 ha | 432.08 ha | 6,133 ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1,281 ha | 1,863 ha | 581.67 ha | Finland |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 690.93 ha | 690.93 ha | Finland |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 82.08 ha | 82.08 ha | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Eritrea or Finland?
- Eritrea, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Eritrea and Finland?
- 0 ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Finland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Finland rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Eritrea ranks 122nd and Finland ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.