Eritrea vs Saudi Arabia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Eritrea
0 ha
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
0 ha
in 2024
Eritrea rank
122nd
Saudi Arabia rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Eritrea
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 122nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,565 ha | 0.9487 ha | 6,564 ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1,281 ha | 4.28 ha | 1,277 ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 4.28 ha | 4.28 ha | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Eritrea or Saudi Arabia?
- Eritrea, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Saudi Arabia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Eritrea and Saudi Arabia?
- 0 ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Saudi Arabia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Saudi Arabia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Eritrea ranks 122nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.