Finland vs Mauritius: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Finland
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Finland rank
122nd
Mauritius rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Finland
- Mauritius
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Mauritius, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 122nd and Mauritius ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 574.11 ha | 14.07 ha | 560.04 ha | Finland |
| 2000s | 1,863 ha | 8.56 ha | 1,855 ha | Finland |
| 2010s | 690.93 ha | 2.14 ha | 688.79 ha | Finland |
| 2020s | 82.08 ha | 0 ha | 82.08 ha | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Finland or Mauritius?
- Finland, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Finland and Mauritius?
- 0 ha, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Mauritius rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Finland ranks 122nd and Mauritius ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.