Georgia vs Iceland: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Georgia
1,871 ha
in 2024
Iceland
1,447 ha
in 2024
Georgia rank
89th
Iceland rank
90th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Georgia
- Iceland
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 1,871 ha against 1,447 ha in Iceland, a difference of 424 ha.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.3 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 89th and Iceland ranks 90th of 221 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,539 ha | 26.44 ha | 1,513 ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 1,701 ha | 4.32 ha | 1,696 ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 2,778 ha | 0 ha | 2,778 ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 1,995 ha | 298.11 ha | 1,697 ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Georgia or Iceland?
- Georgia, at 1,871 ha against 1,447 ha in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Georgia and Iceland?
- 424 ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Iceland?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Iceland rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Georgia ranks 89th and Iceland ranks 90th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.