Gibraltar vs Norway: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Gibraltar
0 ha
in 2024
Norway
0 ha
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
122nd
Norway rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Gibraltar
- Norway
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 122nd and Norway ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.27 ha | 398.1 ha | 360.83 ha | Norway |
| 2000s | 3.62 ha | 1,123 ha | 1,119 ha | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 118.7 ha | 118.7 ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Gibraltar or Norway?
- Gibraltar, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Gibraltar and Norway?
- 0 ha, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Gibraltar and Norway rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Gibraltar ranks 122nd and Norway ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.