Grenada vs Uzbekistan: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Grenada
0 ha
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 ha
in 2024
Grenada rank
122nd
Uzbekistan rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Grenada
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Grenada ranks 122nd and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7373 ha | 5,653 ha | 5,652 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 2.14 ha | 1,151 ha | 1,149 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 2.14 ha | 51.57 ha | 49.43 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Grenada or Uzbekistan?
- Grenada, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Grenada and Uzbekistan?
- 0 ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Uzbekistan rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Grenada ranks 122nd and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.