Ireland vs Saudi Arabia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Ireland
0 ha
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
0 ha
in 2024
Ireland rank
122nd
Saudi Arabia rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Ireland
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 122nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 606.59 ha | 1.33 ha | 605.27 ha | Ireland |
| 2000s | 539.88 ha | 4.28 ha | 535.6 ha | Ireland |
| 2010s | 2,212 ha | 0 ha | 2,212 ha | Ireland |
| 2020s | 310.41 ha | 4.28 ha | 306.13 ha | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Ireland or Saudi Arabia?
- Ireland, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Saudi Arabia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Ireland and Saudi Arabia?
- 0 ha, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Saudi Arabia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ireland and Saudi Arabia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Ireland ranks 122nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.