Isle of Man vs Norway: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Isle of Man
0 ha
in 2024
Norway
0 ha
in 2024
Isle of Man rank
122nd
Norway rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Isle of Man
- Norway
How they compare
Isle of Man currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Isle of Man ranks 122nd and Norway ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0457 ha | 398.1 ha | 398.06 ha | Norway |
| 2000s | 0.2211 ha | 1,123 ha | 1,122 ha | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 118.7 ha | 118.7 ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Isle of Man or Norway?
- Isle of Man, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Isle of Man and Norway?
- 0 ha, with Isle of Man ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Isle of Man and Norway rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Isle of Man ranks 122nd and Norway ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.