Isle of Man vs Uzbekistan: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Isle of Man
0 ha
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 ha
in 2024
Isle of Man rank
122nd
Uzbekistan rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Isle of Man
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Isle of Man currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Isle of Man ranks 122nd and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0381 ha | 5,653 ha | 5,653 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.2211 ha | 1,151 ha | 1,151 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 51.57 ha | 51.57 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Isle of Man or Uzbekistan?
- Isle of Man, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Isle of Man and Uzbekistan?
- 0 ha, with Isle of Man ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Isle of Man and Uzbekistan rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Isle of Man ranks 122nd and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.