Latvia vs Lesotho: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Latvia
0 ha
in 2024
Lesotho
0 ha
in 2024
Latvia rank
122nd
Lesotho rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Latvia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Lesotho, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lesotho ahead.
Latvia ranks 122nd and Lesotho ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 443.82 ha | 17,653 ha | 17,209 ha | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 1,939 ha | 3,053 ha | 1,113 ha | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 519.91 ha | 0 ha | 519.91 ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 21.57 ha | 4.29 ha | 17.28 ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Latvia or Lesotho?
- Latvia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Lesotho as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Latvia and Lesotho?
- 0 ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lesotho?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Lesotho rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Latvia ranks 122nd and Lesotho ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.