Lithuania vs Sweden: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Lithuania
0 ha
in 2024
Sweden
0 ha
in 2024
Lithuania rank
122nd
Sweden rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Lithuania
- Sweden
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Sweden, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.
Lithuania ranks 122nd and Sweden ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 197.04 ha | 338.95 ha | 141.91 ha | Sweden |
| 2000s | 1,007 ha | 289.55 ha | 717.43 ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 114.28 ha | 1,499 ha | 1,384 ha | Sweden |
| 2020s | 43.13 ha | 0 ha | 43.13 ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Lithuania or Sweden?
- Lithuania, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Lithuania and Sweden?
- 0 ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sweden?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Sweden rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Lithuania ranks 122nd and Sweden ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.