Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs OECD: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
82.48 million ha
in 2024
OECD
8.36 million ha
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
5th
OECD rank
8th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • OECD
050.0M100.0M150.0M199020072024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 82.48 million ha against 8.36 million ha in OECD, a difference of 74.12 million ha.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 9.9 times OECD's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and OECD ranks 8th of 31 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) OECD Difference Ahead
1990s 109.88 million ha 13.38 million ha 96.50 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 100.33 million ha 9.89 million ha 90.44 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 89.25 million ha 8.57 million ha 80.68 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 81.44 million ha 8.73 million ha 72.72 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or OECD?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 82.48 million ha against 8.36 million ha in OECD as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and OECD?
74.12 million ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and OECD?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and OECD rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and OECD ranks 8th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs OECD: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/oecd/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs OECD: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.