Mauritius vs Réunion: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Réunion
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius rank
122nd
Réunion rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Mauritius
- Réunion
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Réunion, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Réunion ahead.
Mauritius ranks 122nd and Réunion ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Réunion in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Réunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.07 ha | 45.95 ha | 31.88 ha | Réunion |
| 2000s | 8.56 ha | 0.1933 ha | 8.37 ha | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 2.14 ha | 188.38 ha | 186.24 ha | Réunion |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Mauritius or Réunion?
- Mauritius, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Réunion as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Mauritius and Réunion?
- 0 ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Réunion?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Réunion rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Mauritius ranks 122nd and Réunion ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.