Mauritius vs Samoa: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Samoa
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius rank
122nd
Samoa rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Mauritius
- Samoa
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Samoa, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 122nd and Samoa ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.07 ha | 2.13 ha | 11.94 ha | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 8.56 ha | 0 ha | 8.56 ha | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 2.14 ha | 0 ha | 2.14 ha | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Mauritius or Samoa?
- Mauritius, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Mauritius and Samoa?
- 0 ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Samoa?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Samoa rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Mauritius ranks 122nd and Samoa ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.