Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Zambia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
122.17 million ha
in 2024
Zambia
15.21 million ha
in 2024
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
4th
Zambia rank
4th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Zambia
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M199020072024

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 122.17 million ha against 15.21 million ha in Zambia, a difference of 106.96 million ha.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 8.0 times Zambia's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has been ahead every year.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 4th and Zambia ranks 4th of 31 groups.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 154.76 million ha 15.81 million ha 138.95 million ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 140.04 million ha 15.40 million ha 124.64 million ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 126.57 million ha 14.63 million ha 111.94 million ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 118.99 million ha 14.19 million ha 104.79 million ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Zambia?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 122.17 million ha against 15.21 million ha in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Zambia?
106.96 million ha, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Zambia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Zambia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 4th and Zambia ranks 4th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Zambia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/zambia/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Zambia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.