Rwanda vs Serbia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Rwanda
14,254 ha
in 2024
Serbia
12,150 ha
in 2024
Rwanda rank
65th
Serbia rank
66th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Rwanda
- Serbia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 14,254 ha against 12,150 ha in Serbia, a difference of 2,104 ha.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 66th of 221 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,357 ha | 7,812 ha | 6,455 ha | Serbia |
| 2010s | 4,766 ha | 3,200 ha | 1,566 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 9,330 ha | 3,729 ha | 5,601 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Rwanda or Serbia?
- Rwanda, at 14,254 ha against 12,150 ha in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Rwanda and Serbia?
- 2,104 ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Serbia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Rwanda ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 66th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.