Samoa vs Sweden: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Samoa
0 ha
in 2024
Sweden
0 ha
in 2024
Samoa rank
122nd
Sweden rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Samoa
- Sweden
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Sweden, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 122nd and Sweden ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.13 ha | 395.96 ha | 393.83 ha | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 289.55 ha | 289.55 ha | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 1,499 ha | 1,499 ha | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Samoa or Sweden?
- Samoa, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Samoa and Sweden?
- 0 ha, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Samoa and Sweden rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Samoa ranks 122nd and Sweden ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.