Samoa vs Uzbekistan: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Samoa
0 ha
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 ha
in 2024
Samoa rank
122nd
Uzbekistan rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Samoa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 122nd and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.51 ha | 5,653 ha | 5,650 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 1,151 ha | 1,151 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 51.57 ha | 51.57 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Samoa or Uzbekistan?
- Samoa, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Samoa and Uzbekistan?
- 0 ha, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Samoa and Uzbekistan rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Samoa ranks 122nd and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.