Sweden vs Turkmenistan: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Sweden
0 ha
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 ha
in 2024
Sweden rank
122nd
Turkmenistan rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Sweden
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.
Sweden ranks 122nd and Turkmenistan ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 338.95 ha | 380.33 ha | 41.38 ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 289.55 ha | 51.63 ha | 237.92 ha | Sweden |
| 2010s | 1,499 ha | 0 ha | 1,499 ha | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Sweden or Turkmenistan?
- Sweden, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Sweden and Turkmenistan?
- 0 ha, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Sweden and Turkmenistan rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Sweden ranks 122nd and Turkmenistan ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.