Togo vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area
Togo
196,226 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
193,666 ha
in 2024
Togo rank
39th
Zimbabwe rank
40th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Togo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Togo currently reports 196,226 ha against 193,666 ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2,560 ha.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Togo ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Togo averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 670,200 ha | 1.87 million ha | 1.20 million ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 545,726 ha | 589,836 ha | 44,110 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 450,020 ha | 474,971 ha | 24,951 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 326,091 ha | 190,427 ha | 135,664 ha | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, Togo or Zimbabwe?
- Togo, at 196,226 ha against 193,666 ha in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area between Togo and Zimbabwe?
- 2,560 ha, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Togo and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area?
- Togo ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.