Angola vs South Sudan: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Angola
0.5675 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
1.35 ha per person
in 2024
Angola rank
4th
South Sudan rank
2nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Angola
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 1.35 ha per person against 0.5675 ha per person in Angola, a difference of 0.7825 ha per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 2.4 times Angola's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 4th and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 188 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.7107 ha per person | 1.45 ha per person | 0.739 ha per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.5799 ha per person | 1.31 ha per person | 0.7302 ha per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Angola or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 1.35 ha per person against 0.5675 ha per person in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Angola and South Sudan?
- 0.7825 ha per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Angola and South Sudan rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Angola ranks 4th and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.